Detection Report:
Document - 04/07/2025
Oh look, this guy is back—still confusing "link spam" with argument and hoping nobody reads past the headline.
Let’s play this out for everyone watching:
“How do you know Israel has no plan? Are you in the government?” This is peak bad faith. You don’t need to be a “high-ranking official” to know there's no documented extermination plan—because that’s how international law works. Genocide requires proof of intent, not vibes. The Holocaust had the Wannsee Conference. Rwanda had radio broadcasts directing mass killings. Israel? You’re citing a siege strategy aimed at Hamas operatives, not a blueprint for mass murder.
“Netanyahu liked the Eiland Plan!” Cool, and? The plan was military containment, not ethnic cleansing. It even involves designated safe zones—which you’d know if you read more than the headline. But hey, keep hoping logistics maps are the same as gas chambers. It’s a bold strategy.
“Israel doesn’t allow aid!” Except they do—over 1.3 million tons of it so far. Could they do more? Absolutely. Are they trying to stop Hamas from stealing it? Also yes. You’re screaming “blockade” while ignoring the part where Hamas openly admits to hijacking and hoarding food, fuel, and medicine. You don’t want to talk about that, because your outrage only runs one way.
“Evacuation orders aren’t enough.” Funny—first it’s genocide because they didn’t warn people, now it’s genocide even when they do. You demand proportionality in bombing, but not in logic. You’re faulting Israel for evacuations being hard—as if war in a terrorist-run city should be easy.
“The Hamas charter doesn’t say that anymore!” Oh? So the part where they still quote Quran 7:144, deny Jewish claims to any land, and call for armed resistance “until liberation is complete” just disappeared? That’s not a new charter—it’s a rebrand with the same genocidal mission. And when the actual leadership still talks about “obliterating the Zionist entity”? That’s not old news—that’s last week’s press conference.
So let’s be real here: This isn’t someone debating in good faith. This is someone copy-pasting cherry-picked articles, ignoring every rebuttal, dodging every standard he can’t apply to both sides, and hoping you’re too distracted to notice.
He doesn’t want truth. He wants a villain. He doesn’t want peace. He wants to win the narrative—no matter how many lies it takes.
And the fact that he’s getting this defensive? That just means the facts are working.
Let me know when you're ready for part two. I've got plenty more receipts.
Word:
398
Character:
2552
Authoritative conclusion
The probability that this text was generated by AI.
We are highly confident this text looks like AI generated. 54%
Probability AI generated
Probability Analysis
The probability this text has been written by a human, AI or a mix of the two.
26%
Human 41%
Mixed 33%
AI
Share: